OpenStreetMap and the neglected pedestrian

Room: Track 1 - Talks

Saturday, 18:00 UTC
Duration: 20 minutes (plus Q&A)


Back to schedule
  • Edoardo Neerhut

The evolution of digital maps of the last 20 years has been nothing short of incredible. The experience for the end consumer has continued to improve, with better map data, more intuitive interfaces, and greater portability. A lot of the developments have focused on in-car navigation, with Google Maps, Apple Maps, HERE Maps, and TomTom dedicating significant resources to the space. Even in our beloved OpenStreetMap, vehicle based navigation claims centre stage.

In this presentation we’ll explore the state of pedestrian data in OpenStreetMap, how it differs between cities, why it’s important to think about, and how we might collectively improve the quality of pedestrian data.

To begin with, we’ll take a look at data downloaded with Overpass Turbo. The data represents nodes, ways, and areas with pedestrian relevant tags such as highway=footway and sidewalk=both. Our analysis focused on five cities with differing characteristics:

  • Folsom, USA
  • Heidelberg, Germany
  • Melbourne, Australia
  • Stone Town, Tanzania
  • Yesan, South Korea

These cities differ in population, cultural characteristics, urban planning, history, and topography. We’ll explore what kind of OpenStreetMap tags have been used in each city, how close this matches the state of pedestrian infrastructure, and how the cities compare to one another.

We’ll then look at some reasons why pedestrian data has been neglected including the limitations of satellite imagery, commercial incentives, and data collection methods. In the final part of the presentation we’ll propose and hopefully discuss some of the tools that could help including Mapillary, StreetComplete, GoMap!!, and Vespucci.